Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl Halftime Show: Political and Social Impact

@mitch.social

image

I enjoyed Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show. It was bold, electric, and layered with meaning—exactly what I’d expect from one of the most thought-provoking artists of our time. But beyond the music, I wondered: What did it really mean? What impact did it have or would it have on American society?

So, I turned to OpenAI’s Deep Research to dig into the cultural, social, and political ripple effects of this performance—and what it might signal for America moving forward.

Overview

Kendrick Lamar’s selection as the Super Bowl LIX halftime performer in 2025 was hailed as a culturally significant choice. Lamar is widely regarded as a “once-in-a-generation artist” whose work transcends music and influences global culture (Hip-Hop Legend Kendrick Lamar To Headline Super Bowl 2025 Halftime Show | OutKick). He boasts 22 Grammy wins (including a Pulitzer Prize for Music) and is known for infusing social commentary into his art. Thus, expectations for his show were high – fans and critics anticipated a bold, thought-provoking performance given his track record (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). The NFL’s announcement of Lamar as headliner, however, wasn’t without controversy. Some hip-hop fans (especially in New Orleans) felt it was a snub to local rap icon Lil Wayne, leading the NFL to even apologize to Wayne after he voiced “deep disappointment” at being passed over (Watch Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl halftime show | The FADER). Despite that initial backlash, many saw Lamar’s selection as a progressive step: the latest in a series of halftime acts curated by Jay-Z’s Roc Nation to reflect more diversity and contemporary Black artistry on America’s biggest stage ( Fans blame Jay-Z for Kendrick Lamar’s ‘awful’ Super Bowl performance ). In the lead-up, anticipation mounted for how Lamar – famous for songs like “Alright” and “HUMBLE.” – would balance blockbuster entertainment with his signature political and social messaging.

Historical Context

Lamar’s politically-charged halftime show follows a lineage of Super Bowl performances that doubled as cultural flashpoints. In 2004, Janet Jackson’s infamous “Nipplegate” incident (a wardrobe malfunction during her duet with Justin Timberlake) triggered a massive conservative backlash and FCC crackdown (Super Bowl ’Nipplegate’ controversy: What happened and its aftermath). Jackson was blacklisted by major media outlets and MTV (the show’s producer) was barred from future halftimes (Super Bowl ’Nipplegate’ controversy: What happened and its aftermath), underscoring how a brief moment reshaped debates on decency, race, and gender in entertainment. In 2016, Beyoncé’s halftime cameo became a modern political statement – her dancers donned Black Panther-style berets and she performed “Formation,” paying homage to Black liberation movements. The performance drew immediate right-wing criticism; a Congressman and others condemned Beyoncé’s “pro-Black Panther” imagery as an attack on police (Beyonce's Super Bowl show brings praise and criticism - CBS News), even as others praised her message of Black pride. More recently, the 2022 show (Super Bowl LVI) – headlined by Dr. Dre and a lineup of hip-hop legends including Lamar himself – celebrated West Coast hip-hop and subtly protested racial injustice. Eminem took a knee on stage, echoing Colin Kaepernick’s protest against systemic oppression (Eminem Takes a Knee During 2022 Super Bowl Halftime Performance), while Dr. Dre defiantly performed lyrics that some thought the NFL would censor. These precedents set the stage for Lamar in 2025: the Super Bowl halftime has increasingly become a forum for statements on race, identity, and social issues, not just a pop concert. Lamar’s performance would inevitably be measured against these past moments – from Beyoncé’s and Eminem’s bold gestures to the cautionary tale of Janet Jackson – as viewers wondered how overt or risky his own message might be.

Performance Analysis

Taking the field at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, Kendrick Lamar delivered a 14-minute set that was both a musical medley and a theatrical narrative. The show was framed by actor Samuel L. Jackson, who appeared in character as a flamboyant “Uncle Sam” to emcee the performance (Here’s Who Showed Up to Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show | News | BET). Dressed in a red, white, and blue tracksuit with a gold chain – a satirical twist on the patriotic icon – Jackson’s presence (and quips like “Salutations, it’s your Uncle Sam, and this is the great American game”) set an irreverent tone (Here’s Who Showed Up to Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show | News | BET). This tongue-in-cheek patriotism signaled that Lamar’s show would pointedly examine American identity.

Lamar’s setlist spanned new material from his recent GNX album alongside fan favorites. According to reports, songs performed included “HUMBLE.” and “DNA.” (hits from DAMN.), “Squabble Up,” “Euphoria,” and “Man at the Garden” from his latest project, as well as the Black Panther soundtrack hit “All The Stars.” (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent) (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent). The production was elaborate: at one point a classic car labeled “GNX” was on the field as a prop, serving as a stage for dancers – a nod to both his album and West Coast car culture. Throughout the show, Lamar wove in theatrical elements. Jackson’s Uncle Sam would reappear to introduce segments, reinforcing a narrative thread about America’s relationship with Black culture (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent).

Several guest stars amplified the performance’s impact. R&B singer SZA joined Lamar for two soulful duets, performing their tracks “luther” (from GNX) and the Grammy-nominated “All The Stars” (Here’s Who Showed Up to Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show | News | BET). Their chemistry on “All The Stars” – a song about hope and black excellence – brought emotional weight to the set. Another surprise was tennis legend Serena Williams, who appeared toward the end during Lamar’s explosive song “Not Like Us.” Serena, herself a Compton native like Lamar, proceeded to Crip-walk on stage (Here’s Who Showed Up to Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show | News | BET) – a dance move from LA street culture. The moment was layered: back in 2012 Serena was criticized by conservative commentators for doing the Crip Walk after a Wimbledon victory (Watch Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl halftime show | The FADER); here she performed it proudly on national TV, reclaiming that cultural expression. Her cameo not only celebrated their shared roots but also subtly rebuked those past criticisms. The final guest was producer DJ Mustard, Lamar’s longtime collaborator, who came out hyping the crowd for the finale “TV Off” – the closing number he produced (Watch Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl halftime show | The FADER). Mustard’s booming ad-libs and West Coast beats underscored the show’s hip-hop authenticity.

Visually and choreographically, Lamar’s show was dynamic and symbolic. He performed in a simple black leather jacket and cap (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent), allowing the surrounding pageantry to speak loudly. Hundreds of backup dancers in streetwear filled the field, moving in synchronized formations. The stage design mixed elements of city streets and patriotic motifs. Notably, Uncle Sam Jackson at one point delivered biting lines about American hypocrisy – “Y’all love us when it’s profitable, huh?” he sneered, addressing how the nation loves Black culture’s entertainment but not Black struggle (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). Such interjections, coupled with the imagery (e.g. Jackson’s blinged-out Uncle Sam), gave the performance a satirical edge. Even Lamar’s song choices carried messages. For instance, the song “luther” (performed with SZA) alludes to Martin Luther King Jr.’s ethos, while “Not Like Us” – his chart-topping single – is ostensibly a diss track aimed at Drake, but its hook (“they not like us”) resonated on a broader level about outsiders who appropriate culture or doubt Black excellence (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). In the halftime rendition of “Not Like Us,” Lamar teased the song repeatedly before unleashing it, saying, “I want to perform their favorite song, but you know they love to sue” (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent). This was a wink to his feud with Drake – the original lyrics mock Drake’s album Certified Lover Boy with a harsh line (“Certified lover boy? Certified pedophile”) which Lamar censored for TV (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent). He omitted that slur and the N-word during the show, delivering a cleaner yet still fiery version. Interestingly, Serena’s participation during this song added a personal touch since Drake and Serena were once romantically linked (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent) – a subtle jab at his rival.

Overall, Lamar’s artistic vision fused high-energy entertainment with political theater. The music itself spanned celebratory anthems (the crowd roared during “HUMBLE.”’s famous hook) and poignant moments (a snippet of a new track “Bodies” invoked reflection (Every surprise celebrity guest in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show | The Independent)). The choreography (from Krump-style street dances to step-team precision) and stage props (like the GNX car and red-blue color motifs) reinforced themes of Black urban culture intersecting with American iconography. By the time Lamar closed out with the triumphant final notes of “TV Off,” accompanied by fireworks and a cheering stadium, it was clear he had delivered not just a concert but a statement-laden spectacle.

Public and Media Reactions

Reactions to Lamar’s halftime show in the U.S. were sharply mixed, splitting along cultural and political lines. Here’s a breakdown of the response across different segments:

Social and Political Themes

Lamar’s halftime production was laden with social and political themes, making it one of the most message-driven Super Bowl shows to date. The overarching theme was a celebration of Black identity and a critique of how America treats Black culture. This was embodied by Samuel L. Jackson’s subversive Uncle Sam character. Rather than the classic patriotic figure pointing and saying “I Want You,” Lamar’s Uncle Sam wore bling and a tracksuit, smirking as he exposed American hypocrisy – “This Uncle Sam had a knowing smirk, a gold chain… because if America was going to continue exploiting Black culture, it might as well acknowledge the real faces behind it,” one analysis noted (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET) (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). In that single image, the show tackled cultural appropriation: the idea that America eagerly consumes Black-created music, fashion, and slang (“loves us when it’s profitable”) while often rejecting or marginalizing Black people themselves (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). By putting a Black Uncle Sam at center stage, Lamar flipped the narrative – asserting that Black Americans are America just as much as any symbol of the flag or Uncle Sam is.

Racial identity and pride were celebrated throughout the performance. The extensive inclusion of Black artists (from the headliner and guests to the predominantly Black ensemble of dancers) made a statement in itself, especially on a stage historically dominated by white pop/rock acts. Lamar’s song “luther” is widely interpreted as an homage to civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr., and performing it at the Super Bowl – essentially a national holiday – felt like honoring Black leaders in a space they’re rarely invoked. The choreography and attire also referenced Black cultural movements; for example, some dancers wore berets reminiscent of the Black Panther Party era, and Serena’s Crip Walk reference to West Coast Black street culture boldly injected a normally stigmatized Black dance into a family-friendly broadcast. This reinforced a theme of unapologetic Black expression – taking elements often labeled as “other” or “unacceptable” and presenting them proudly to mainstream America.

The show also delved into systemic oppression and resilience. Through visuals and Jackson’s narration, Lamar nodded to current issues: book bans and curriculum fights that whitewash history, rollbacks of diversity initiatives, and voter suppression laws – all of which disproportionately affect Black Americans (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET) (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). At one point between songs, a giant screen reportedly flashed historical imagery of civil rights marches and prominent African-American figures (this was briefly seen in the broadcast montage). While Lamar did not deliver a verbal political speech, the set’s narrative implied that despite these modern struggles, Black people remain, in his words, “uneraseable.” The phrase “We gon’ be alright”, one of Lamar’s famous lines, was not performed outright (he had done it in 2022’s show), but the sentiment permeated the performance. The climactic number “Not Like Us,” beyond its surface rap beef context, carried a broader social meaning: an anthem of distinction and defiance. Many interpreted the song in this setting as Lamar drawing a line between those who truly live the Black experience (“us”) and those who co-opt or oppress (“them”) – essentially a protest against being stereotyped or imitated without respect. The fact that this track had won multiple Grammys and was fresh in public consciousness gave it extra weight; its repeated hook became a rallying cry in the stadium.

Another key theme was the role of hip-hop as social activism. By centering a politically aware rapper at halftime, the show itself was a statement on hip-hop’s evolution – from a genre born as the “CNN of the streets” to a platform now broadcasting social messages to 100 million viewers at once. Lamar’s performance explicitly honored this tradition. He tipped his hat to past activist musicians: the staging included a brief instrumental nod to James Brown’s “Say It Loud – I’m Black and I’m Proud,” connecting Lamar’s modern protest music to the lineage of 60s/70s soul and funk that carried the civil rights message (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). Similarly, invoking Beyoncé’s 2016 Black Panther homage placed Lamar in a continuum of Black artists using the Super Bowl to amplify calls for justice (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). The presence of figures like Serena Williams (a Black woman who has broken barriers in a traditionally white sport) further underlined themes of intersectional representation and empowerment.

The performance’s political commentary challenged mainstream narratives in subtle ways. At a time when some politicians claim that discussions of racism are divisive or unpatriotic, Lamar dared to center that discussion in a unifying national event. His Uncle Sam sketch was essentially saying: patriotism isn’t just flag-waving; it should include acknowledging those who built the country. Lines like “We are the heartbeat and soul of this nation”, delivered in the BET post-show commentary, encapsulate what Lamar conveyed artistically (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET) (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). This directly counters narratives that try to minimize Black contributions or silence conversations about racial injustice. Also, by focusing on unity within the Black community (“we” in his lyrics) and not offering the typical token gestures of “unity for all” that Super Bowl shows often do, Lamar challenged the comfortable narrative. He didn’t end the show with anodyne patriotic songs or a generic call for everyone to come together; instead, his finale “We’re not like them” sentiment was somewhat provocative on a stage that usually strives not to offend. In doing so, Lamar aligned with the approach of activists: sometimes you have to unsettle the status quo to get a real conversation going.

Lastly, the theme of resilience was omnipresent. The title of BET’s review – “You can roll back policies, but you can’t erase us” – is essentially the thesis of Lamar’s halftime statement (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET). Every element, from the song selections to the guests, reinforced that despite centuries of oppression (slavery, segregation, etc., briefly alluded to in the performance script), Black Americans endure and shape the nation’s culture. The jubilant tone of segments like “All The Stars” and the sheer spectacle of a Black hip-hop show at the Super Bowl drove that home. It was a declaration that Black culture isn’t just surviving in America, it’s thriving in the spotlight – on its own terms.

Future Impact

Lamar’s 2025 halftime show could have lasting implications for the music industry, the NFL, and the intersection of pop culture with politics. One immediate impact is on the music industry and artists’ approach to mass audiences. By successfully delivering a message-driven performance on such a mainstream stage, Lamar may inspire other artists to be bolder in mixing art and activism. The huge post-show streaming bump for “Not Like Us” (a 430% increase) (Kendrick Lamar's Epic Super Bowl Performance Spikes Streams 430%) demonstrates that being socially conscious does not hurt commercial interest – in fact, controversy and substance can amplify an artist’s reach. Record labels and artists might take note that a halftime show with depth can still engage millions and even drive sales/streams. We might see future Super Bowl performers (or awards show performers) feel encouraged to include poignant themes or address current events, knowing that Lamar managed to spark dialogue and also entertain. In essence, he may have expanded the creative boundaries for what a Super Bowl set can be, which historically was a medley of hits with little commentary.

For the NFL and corporate sponsors, Lamar’s show is a case study in balancing brand risk and reward. The NFL under Commissioner Roger Goodell and in partnership with Jay-Z has been pushing for more diverse, contemporary acts – a deliberate evolution from the conservative choices of the late 2000s. Lamar’s performance, with all its political undertones, tested how far the league could go. Despite some backlash, there was no major sponsor pullout or immediate ratings collapse (the minor dip in halftime viewership was offset by the game’s overall strong ratings) (Kendrick Lamar's Epic Super Bowl Performance Spikes Streams 430%) (Kendrick Lamar’s Epic Super Bowl Performance Spikes Streams 430% - That Grape Juice). This suggests that the NFL’s gamble paid off: they captured cultural relevance and critical acclaim from many quarters, without suffering significant financial or PR harm. Going forward, the league might be emboldened to continue booking artists who have something to say, not just something to sell. We could see the Super Bowl stage remain a platform for cultural moments – a place where artists comment on social issues in a way that gets everyone talking Monday morning. However, the mixed reception will also be carefully analyzed by the NFL. The fact that some fans (especially older or more conservative viewers) were turned off means the NFL might consider alternating the tone of halftime shows year-to-year. They may follow Lamar’s provocative show next time with a “safer” choice to appease those critics, much like how after 2004’s incident the league gravitated to legacy rock acts for a period. There’s also the possibility the NFL institutes even tighter control on field performers (after the flag protest incident) to prevent unexpected political displays. In short, Lamar’s show will inform the NFL’s future calculus: it proved they can present socially conscious art on their biggest night, but it also highlighted the persistent cultural divide in the audience.

In broader political discourse, the image of Kendrick Lamar using America’s most-watched entertainment platform to address racial injustice may become an enduring reference point. It arrives at a time of heated debates over how and where such issues should be discussed (with some saying sports/entertainment should be apolitical). The performance might contribute to normalizing the presence of social commentary in mass entertainment – reinforcing that issues like systemic racism are mainstream concerns, not niche or inappropriate for prime time. Politicians and pundits might cite the 2025 halftime show in future discussions: for example, when arguing about the role of athletes and artists in activism, Lamar’s show could be Exhibit A that these messages have a place even at the heart of American sports culture. It could also subtly influence public opinion – viewers who might not read articles about voter suppression or Black history erasure perhaps absorbed some of Lamar’s message through the spectacle and later sought to learn more (especially younger viewers who idolize Lamar). In the long run, this performance might be seen as part of the ongoing narrative of the NFL grappling with social justice: coming several years after players’ anthem protests and the formation of the Inspire Change initiative, it shows activism moving from the margins (players kneeling at the sidelines) to the center stage (the halftime show itself). That progression could pressure the NFL and its partners to continue addressing the issues raised, lest it seem performative.

Finally, the Super Bowl halftime format itself may evolve because of this. Future artists will likely reference Lamar’s show when planning theirs – whether to embrace a similar approach or consciously avoid it. It’s possible that more artists from genres with strong activist traditions (hip-hop, R&B, even rock) will be tapped for halftimes, continuing the trend of socially aware performances. We might also see more innovative collaborations like Lamar bringing out Serena Williams – bridging sports, music, and politics in one moment. Conversely, some entertainers who prefer to steer clear of controversy might double-down on more “neutral” performances, giving the NFL options to mix it up each year. Importantly, corporate sponsors (like Apple Music, which sponsored the show) will review how Lamar’s edgy content affected brand sentiment. Given that Apple’s promotion of the show on social media was positive during the broadcast (Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl 59 Halftime Show with SZA, Mustard, More Thrills Fans | News, Scores, Highlights, Stats, and Rumors | Bleacher Report), it seems they embraced it. If sponsors remain on board, that paves the way for more daring shows. In summary, Lamar’s halftime set a new precedent: it showed that the Super Bowl stage can be used as an artistic platform to comment on society, not just to entertain. This could encourage a new era of halftime shows where cultural significance is as much a goal as spectacle.

Actionable Insights

Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl halftime performance stands as a milestone for American culture and offers several key takeaways:

  • Redefining Cultural Platforms: The show demonstrated that even the most mainstream, corporate-sponsored events can host meaningful social commentary. This signifies a shift in American culture – audiences (especially younger generations) now almost expect artists to say something of substance on big stages. Going forward, event organizers and sponsors should recognize that allowing creative freedom can generate enormous buzz and cultural relevance, even if it courts some controversy.

  • The Power of Representation: Lamar’s halftime proved the impact of representation on a grand scale. It wasn’t just a concert; it was a celebration of Black excellence in front of a global audience. This moment signifies progress: a hip-hop artist from Compton unapologetically highlighted Black history and style in what used to be a very Middle-America show. Future productions in mass media – from music award shows to Olympics ceremonies – can take a cue that authentic representation resonates and can educate audiences without diminishing entertainment value.

  • Hip-Hop as a Vehicle for Change: The performance reinforced hip-hop’s role as a driving force in social activism. Just as rock musicians in the 60s or 70s used concerts to protest war or injustice, today’s hip-hop artists are the loudest voices of social critique. Lamar set an example of how to blend artistry and advocacy in a way that garners attention. This could embolden more hip-hop artists (and artists in general) to use their platforms for advocacy, knowing that it can spark national conversations. For the hip-hop industry, it’s a reminder that the genre’s conscience and commercial appeal aren’t mutually exclusive – in fact, they can amplify each other (Kendrick Lamar's Epic Super Bowl Performance Spikes Streams 430%).

  • Navigating Backlash and Dialogue: The mixed reactions to Lamar’s show highlight the enduring divides in American audience preferences. Rather than seeing this purely as a negative, it provides an opportunity for dialogue. Organizations can glean that pushing boundaries will invite criticism, but also engagement. The NFL’s experience here is telling: it faced some backlash from conservative corners, yet also gained praise and likely new younger viewers appreciative of the boldness. The actionable insight for brands and event planners is to know your audience segments. You may need to find ways to acknowledge dissent (as the NFL did with its clarifying statement on the protestor (NFL Issues Statement After Viral Palestine-Sudan Flag Protest at Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Performance | News | BET)) while still standing by the creative vision. In doing so, you can address controversy without stifling the message.

  • Future Strategy for Entertainment Leaders: Jay-Z’s influence in halftime shows since 2019 has been significant ( Fans blame Jay-Z for Kendrick Lamar’s ‘awful’ Super Bowl performance ) ( Fans blame Jay-Z for Kendrick Lamar’s ‘awful’ Super Bowl performance ), and Lamar’s performance will be part of that legacy. The takeaway for industry strategists is that curation of such major platforms should consider both entertainment impact and cultural impact. There is now a proven template for a halftime show that generates next-day discussion on societal issues and musical performance. Expect future Super Bowl artists to be chosen not just for chart-topping hits, but for cultural resonance. Event organizers should prepare for multi-dimensional evaluations of success – it’s no longer just about TV ratings or avoiding offense, but also about what conversation you ignite.

In conclusion, Kendrick Lamar’s 2025 Super Bowl halftime show was more than a medley of hits – it was a reflection of America’s ongoing dialogue with itself. It affirmed that Black culture is an indelible part of the American story, and it pushed the envelope for how the Super Bowl (a modern secular holiday) can be used to spotlight social issues. This moment suggests that American entertainment is willing to take on greater social responsibility, and it underscores the idea that progress often comes through prominent displays of truth in popular culture. Moving forward, the convergence of sports, music, and politics seen in this halftime show could become a blueprint for driving social progress in the public arena – proving that when done thoughtfully, mass entertainment can indeed spark meaningful change (Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show: You Can Roll Back Policies, But You Can’t Erase Us | News | BET).

Sources:

mitch.social
Mitch Jackson ⚖️

@mitch.social

🏛️ Lawyer. Voice behind Uncensored Objection. I cross-examine political gaslighting and call out the BS. No filter. No fear
https://mitchthelawyer.substack.com/

🔗 https://linktr.ee/mitchjackson

Post reaction in Bluesky

*To be shown as a reaction, include article link in the post or add link card

Reactions from everyone (0)