Issue: https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/issues/2551
Copilot share link (generated with Claude Sonnet 4, requires GitHub account/login): https://github.com/copilot/share/88424124-43a4-80d6-b001-724be0962158
Prompt:
Can you please summarize this issue thread for me, highlighting core arguments with possible rebuttals from the Bluesky/AT Protocol developers to those arguments?
Answer:
I'll help you analyze this GitHub issue about increasing Bluesky's character limit. Let me first gather more information about the discussion and any developer responses.
Summary of Issue #2551: Increase Post Character Limit to 500
Core Request: The issue proposes increasing Bluesky's post character limit from 300 to 500 characters, including hashtags and emojis.
Primary Arguments FOR the Change:
- Competitive Advantage: Other platforms like LinkedIn and Facebook have higher limits and see better engagement with longer posts
- User Satisfaction: Current 300-character limit is restrictive, forcing users to abbreviate or fragment posts
- Content Quality: More characters would enable detailed thoughts and comprehensive ideas
- User Feedback: The issue includes embedded posts from Bluesky users requesting longer limits
Community Discussion Points:
Supporting Views:
- Users find the current limit forces awkward abbreviations and punctuation removal
- 500 characters would be a significant quality-of-life improvement
- Threading is currently cumbersome for longer thoughts
Alternative Solutions Proposed:
- "Show More" button: Display first 300 characters with expandable content
- User-customizable limits: Let readers choose their preferred display length
- Improved threading: Better tools for multi-post threads instead of increasing limits
- Hybrid approach: Keep top-level posts at 300, allow longer threaded replies
Potential Developer/Platform Concerns:
While no official Bluesky developers have commented in this thread, based on the community discussion, likely concerns would include:
- Platform Identity: Preserving the "microblogging feel" that defines the platform's social experience
- Timeline Readability: Longer posts could create a cluttered, less scannable timeline
- User Experience: "Show more" buttons might create friction and snippet-heavy timelines
- Feature Creep: Once increased to 500, pressure might grow for even higher limits
- Design Constraints: Current character limits contribute to the overall user experience and platform tone
Current Status:
The issue remains open with ongoing community discussion. The conversation shows a split between those wanting immediate limit increases and those preferring better threading tools or expandable content solutions.
Note: These results may be incomplete as API responses are limited. You can view the full discussion at: https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/issues/2551
