The New York Times published a story that should make every serious

@rusni-pizda.bsky.social

The New York Times published a story that should make every serious observer gag. CIA Director John Ratcliffe flew into Moscow and sat down with FSB chief Bortnikov, delivering a bleak assessment of Russia's grinding meat assault: the average Russian soldier lasts 35 minutes on the forward edge, and territorial gains over the last 18 months amount to roughly one percent. No threats, no ultimatums, just a quiet plea to cut a deal before the economic and military bottom falls out completely.

The Fantasy of a Rational Kremlin

Let me translate what this actually is. Washington is still treating the Kremlin like a rational partner capable of absorbing reality from an intelligence professional Putin supposedly respects as a fellow spy. That fantasy died somewhere around the third month of the full-scale invasion. Moscow delivers only upbeat assessments, imperial denial dressed up as strategic patience. Putin has spent years purging anyone who brings him numbers that do not flatter his worldview. Hand-delivering the truth via back-channel to the FSB changes nothing when the entire system is built on lying upward.

This move reeks of the same appeasement logic that helped get us here. The West keeps hoping that one more realistic briefing will do it. One more cleverly worded assessment. One more signal that time is not on Russia's side. The hope is that this will magically produce a leader in the Kremlin willing to admit his war is a strategic dead end. It will not.

The Disconnect Between Goals and Capacity

Russia's political goals remain completely disconnected from its actual military capacity. Those goals demand the total subordination of Ukraine. Every meter they crawl forward costs them thousands of men they cannot sustainably replace. Their logistics are already burning. Their supply lines are facing growing strain. The demographic math is catastrophic.

The only assessment the Kremlin understands is delivered by Ukrainian drones, artillery, and growing Western weapons systems used without artificial restrictions.

Ukraine is actively shaping its own fate rather than relying on great-power diplomacy to deliver salvation. Our defense is active. Our long-range strike capability is expanding. The initiative on several sectors has already shifted. Their recruitment cannot keep pace with the rate at which we are killing them. The path to ending this war runs through Russian battlefield defeat. The CIA director does not gain any advantage by acting as a messenger boy in another polite conversation in Moscow.

The Danger of a Negotiated Freeze

Ratcliffe's trip confirms what Kyiv has said for years. Large parts of the American establishment still view this as a manageable regional conflict that can be massaged into a negotiated freeze. They see it as an existential imperial war that the defender must win. Freezing the front line now would simply hand Moscow time to reconstitute for the next round. That is only the absence of conflict, not true peace. Surrender on the installment plan.

The only assessment the Kremlin understands is delivered by Ukrainian drones, artillery, and growing Western weapons systems used without artificial restrictions. Everything else is a distraction. Moscow respects only power and the demonstrated will to use it. The sooner Washington internalizes that fact, the fewer Ukrainian towns will need to be rebuilt from rubble.

rusni-pizda.bsky.social
Rusni_pizda

@rusni-pizda.bsky.social

For those who prefer consuming analytical content about geopolitics and the russo-Ukrainian war on Telegram from a pro-Ukrainian perspective, subscribe to my channel: https://t.me/medoyid_uaa

Post reaction in Bluesky

*To be shown as a reaction, include article link in the post or add link card

Reactions from everyone (0)